Man's virtues and sins

Man's virtues and sins
Both have a price..!
the only difference is that
get the price of the quality,
And there is a price to be paid for the crime."
,
'Divya Sampadvimokshay Nibandayasuri Mata.
Yesterday, two retired high officials met and discussed. There was spiritual discussion but there was also a topical discussion.
It is really worth considering to what extent it is appropriate to divide human beings in the name of caste, and religion?
On the basis of nature, Gita is divided into divine wealth and demonic wealth. Devasura struggle has always been taken place. It is natural.
In all castes, religions, men of Devkoti will be found and also of Asurkoti. This category is associated with nature, it is not right to associate it with religion. Only those who connect with religion whose understanding is not clear. Religion is an anthropology that always gives welfare measures. Correctly The art of living life  is a different matter.
Kauravas, Pandavas belonged to the same caste and religion, but because of their nature, they were divided into divine and demonic. Arjun was endowed with divine wealth and was running away from demonic wealth instead of facing it.
Krishna asked him to face it. In this sense the Devasura struggle has always been happening.
It shows the distinction between good people and bad people. Kauravas, Pandavas were also related to each other.
This relationship was between good and bad people. There was no talk of any opposite caste, religion. In such a situation, it is like understanding the message of holy book GITA for everyone.
That all good people should come to one and the same unanimity, irrespective of the supposedly different caste, creed.
Good and true people are found in every caste, religion. They are worthy to be called religious. They are endowed with divine wealth.
If the Pandavas had some demonic wealth and the Kauravas had some divine wealth, Krishna would have had to make his message more clear. Among the Kauravas, there were some good personalities such as Bhishma, Drona etc. But they were in favor of injustice, so they became partakers of demonic wealth.
The real conflict was between these two estates.
Similarly, not understanding it in the present context is an undue loss to all. Where everyone has to live together, it is very important to understand this topic clearly.
Gita does not support the mutual struggle of good people on the ground that they belong to different caste, religion. Gita directly talks about the difference between divine wealth and demonic wealth.
There is a clear description of both the estates in the sixteenth chapter of the Gita.
These properties are conflicting, it can be easily known from their description. There is equality in divine wealth, there is disparity in demonic wealth.
In divine wealth, there is victory, happiness, sorrow, profit, equality in enemy & friend. Arjuna is advised to fight by being established in this equanimity. Therefore, divine wealth is considered for liberation and for tying demonic wealth.
A person with divine wealth will know this secret very well. He will protect the person of divine wealth and will stop the demonic person who harms others with strength and power.
Caste, religion are lifestyles of living in their own way. They cannot be made the basis of struggle. For that, only the hymn of Saint Dnyaneshwar is right.
"Let's wake up the flame with the flame. Let the Ganges of love flow. Let everyone who comes in the way embrace the poor and downtrodden. Let the Ganges of love flow."
Love is the true, fundamental solution, everything else is a game of different intellects.
The enmity remains the same.
Vision needs to be changed. Where there are bad people, there are good people also, who want to live together in peace, love. All of them are warmly welcomed, accepted, respected. If not, then it is necessary to understand Krishna's Karmayoga properly. Whatever is the right understanding, without any partiality. Because partiality does not differentiate between the divine &  the demonic, nor does it want to make a difference.